header-logo header-logo

14 September 2012 / Lehna Hewitt , Kim Beatson
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Features , Family , Costs
printer mail-detail

Waste not...

istock_000013952999medium_4

Kim Beatson & Lehna Hewitt track the latest developments surrounding wasted costs orders in family proceedings

A legal adviser whose conduct is improper, unreasonable or negligent can be ordered to pay the costs incurred by their own client or another party as a result of such conduct.

The term “legal adviser” has been broadly interpreted and could include counsel, solicitors or another representative. Counsel’s responsibility may include drafting and settling proceedings and is not limited to advocacy (Brown v Bennett [2002] 2 All ER 273).

A wasted costs order can even be made against expert witnesses who cause significant expense as a result of failing in their duty to the court (Phillips and Other v Symes and Others 2 [2004] EWHC 2330 (Ch), [2005] 4 All ER 519).

Making a wasted costs order

The power of the court to make a wasted costs order is found in s 51(6) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 and now s 4 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll