header-logo header-logo

04 November 2016 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Walking the tightrope

nlj_7721_dobson

The Scottish “named person” service is unlawful, says Nicholas Dobson

  • The information sharing provisions in Pt 4 of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 are incompatible with the rights of children, young persons and parents and may in practice result in a disproportionate interference with their Art 8 rights.

Child welfare is a pressing and emotional national concern. Children are inherently vulnerable and obviously need careful nurturing and protection to ensure their healthy growth and development. But striking a fair and lawful balance between the rights of children and those of their parents or guardians is rather like walking a swaying tightrope. Nevertheless, this tightrope must be successfully navigated by any venturing to legislate in this area.

The Scottish government consequently came unstuck with its undoubtedly well-meaning “named person” provisions in Pt 4 of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 (the Act). For on 28 July 2016 the Supreme Court in The Christian Institute and others v. The Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51, [2016] All ER (D) 156 (Jul), decided that this measure as currently framed was ‘incompatible with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll