header-logo header-logo

29 September 2016
Issue: 7716 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Veteran judicial review

A judicial review is being brought against the Ministry of Defence (MoD) for failing to support former and serving service personnel subject to judicial process and investigation.

Solicitor Hilary Meredith, who is acting on behalf of military personnel in the case, recently gave evidence at the Defence Sub Committee’s inquiry, which looked into the way investigations are being conducted by the Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT).

IHAT is due to complete its work in 2019. Meredith is calling for veterans to be given the right to independent legal advice, a framework of help and support, funding, a fair trial and for a time limit to be imposed on cases.

Meredith said: “I passionately believe that the MoD should be held to account when it fails our servicemen and women. A framework of support and assistance needs to be put in place.”

Issue: 7716 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll