header-logo header-logo

05 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

VAT

American Express Services Europe Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] EWHC 120 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 206 (Jan)

The issue of whether a contract involved the provision of one or more supplies for VAT purposes and other issues relating to place of supply were issues of legal evaluation, and therefore issues of law, that might require a multi-factoral assessment based on a number of primary facts so that the appeal court should be slow to interfere with that overall assessment and should not re-open primary findings of fact

The issue of single or multiple supply had to logically be determined as a pre-requisite to addressing the issue of place of supply. The starting point was that every supply of goods and services had to be regarded as distinct and independent.

The relevant transactions had to be analysed with due regard to all the circumstances in which they took place and the essential features of the transaction had to be considered at a level of generality that corresponded to economic reality, objectively, and from the perspective of the typical customer rather than the supplier. The extent of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll