header-logo header-logo

Unison: unfair is not unlawful

08 September 2017
Issue: 7760 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

The Supreme Court’s ruling that employment tribunal fees ‘are unfair, therefore they are unlawful’ is ‘surprising’, a senior employment law solicitor has said.

Writing in this week’s NLJGSC Solicitors partner Tessa Fry points out that most of the evidence was rejected by the High Court and the Court of Appeal, whereas the Supreme Court ‘accepted almost all of Unison’s arguments some of which were based on hypothetical examples and assumptions, rather than actual evidence’.

Fry says the introduction of fees was not the sole reason for the decline in tribunal cases, for example, the qualifying period for unfair dismissal was raised from one to two years, compensation for unfair dismissal was limited to 12 months’ pay, and tribunals were given increased powers to strike out claims at an early stage.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll