header-logo header-logo

09 January 2015 / Nick Rowles-Davies
Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

An unexplored arena: Pt 2

Nick Rowles-Davies discusses due diligence, risk & insurance in his second article on litigation funding trends

Anyone familiar with the process of litigation will recognise two things: first, it is not cheap, and second, there is no guarantee of a successful outcome. As a result, when someone is deciding whether to litigate or not they are in no small part making a decision about risk—namely, is this litigation an investment worth making, or am I throwing good money after bad?

Litigation finance is a means to alleviate both cost risk and litigation risk fears for a potential claimant. In essence, an external investor will step into the claimant’s shoes and take over a pre-agreed share of the risks. Funding arrangements thus bring claimant and financier together into a close partnership, regulated by a contract, in which risk, due diligence of that risk, and insurance against risk are tightly interlinked.

Risk

By entering into their contractual arrangement, client and funder form a consensus on several key agreements: the budget needed to fund the case; what it will be spent on; the definition of success;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll