header-logo header-logo

23 June 2011 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Under new rule (6)

Geraldine Morris considers whether the options for financial relief in family proceedings are on the right track

Practitioners are likely by now to have started to experience the changes introduced by the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010). In relation to financial orders (ancillary relief as was) the majority of the relevant procedural provisions can be found in FPR 2010, Pt 9 and the linked practice direction (PD) 9A. However, a feature of the new rules is that no application to the court, whether financial or children related, can be looked at in isolation. The overarching principles either introduced or cemented by the rules will impact on financial orders as much as any other. Key provisions to take into account are:

 

  • Terminology—the glossary to the FPR 2010 isn’t particularly enlightening (most practitioners will surely know the meaning of “affidavit”) but it is clear from the rules themselves that an attempt has been made to modernise the terminology which in the case of financial proceedings is marked by a shift from the slightly antiquated “ancillary relief” to “financial remedies” or “financial orders”.
  • Overriding objective
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll