header-logo header-logo

17 September 2015
Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Travelling tradesmen victory

ECJ decides that travelling time is working time

Time spent by carers or tradesmen travelling to their first client and back from their final client counts towards the 48-hour working week, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has held.

The case, brought by burglar alarm and security equipment installers, Tyco, in Spain, involved workers with no office base who travelled each day from their own home to customers’ homes or workplaces. The court held that, where workers have no fixed place of work and use a company vehicle, their travelling time to and from work and between clients should be included in the definition of “working time”.

The ruling, (Case C-266/14), applies automatically in the UK, but does not directly affect pay.

Makbool Javaid, partner at Simons Muirhead and Burton, says: “This is a landmark ruling by the ECJ which further clarifies the meaning of working time.

“It has significant practical implications for employers who have workers with no fixed place of work and whose duties require them to visit the clients’ premises.

“Those employers paying the national minimum wage (NMW) should seek legal advice to thoroughly analyse the working practices and determine the statutory position under the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015, which appears to suggest that such travelling time does not count towards the NMW.”

Ivor Adair, employment lawyer at Slater and Gordon, says: “The decision will have an immediate effect on UK law. It is most obviously beneficial to UK mobile workers, such as electrical fitters or peripatetic care staff, in that the time spent travelling from home to their first appointment of the day, and back home from their last appointment of the day, will now be classified as working time.”

Issue: 7668 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll