header-logo header-logo

11 July 2025 / Sarah Everington , Alex Adams , Farida Hindi
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Features , Family , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Trapped by ‘I do’

225411
Predatory marriages are exploiting the weaknesses of current wills law: Sarah Everington, Alex Adams & Farida Hindi set out what can be done to safeguard vulnerable adults
  • Predatory marriage weaponises English law’s automatic will-revocation and intestacy rules to trap isolated or cognitively impaired adults into unions for financial gain.
  • Pre- or post-nuptial agreements, capacity assessments and marriage-caveats can flag undue influence, but remain non-binding without robust legislative backing.
  • The Law Commission’s 2025 proposals to abolish will-revocation on marriage and shift the burden of proving undue influence seek to deter exploiters and uphold vulnerable testators’ wishes.
  • Until then, proactive legal advice, regular familial engagement and increased public awareness remain the most effective tools of prevention.

Legal practitioners are increasingly finding themselves at the intersection of safeguarding vulnerable individuals and navigating complex legal frameworks. Recent developments and highly publicised debates such as the assisted dying Bill and the Law Commission’s 2025 ‘Modernising Wills’ report have reignited national discussion around the protection of vulnerable adults during and at the end of life. Both debates have been shaped by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll