header-logo header-logo

Tort: a new landscape?

06 August 2021 / Vijay Ganapathy
Issue: 7944 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
54498
Vijay Ganapathy considers the future significance of recent cases in tort on foreseeability, quantum & withdrawal of Part 36 offers
  • Begum v Maran (UK) Ltd: foreseeability and liability for overseas activities.
  • Head v Culver Heating Co Ltd: quantum
  • Wormald v Ahmed: settlements and limitations of Part 36 offers:

During lockdown the courts have continued to consider and hand down judgments in cases which are likely significantly to alter the future landscape in many areas of tort.

An example is Begum v Maran (UK) Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 326, where the claimant (B) issued proceedings following the tragic death of her husband, MD Khalil Mollah (K). K suffered a fall while involved in dismantling a decommissioned ship, the Maran Centaurus (MC), at a shipbreaking yard in Chattogram, Bangladesh.

The International Labour Organisation has described shipbreaking as ‘one of the most dangerous jobs in the world’. The court heard that unskilled workers employed in their thousands are exposed to both physical and chemical hazards (many of these ships contain asbestos, mercury and even radioactive compounds) causing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll