header-logo header-logo

11 April 2019 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Toppling the fourth pillar

The legal advice sector has long since suffered from a difficult relationship with local authority support, says Jon Robins

Over the last four decades, Hackney Community Law Centre has enjoyed a pretty good relationship with its council. That changed last month after its cabinet voted through a swingeing 45% cut in its £203,000 grant. This follows last year’s cut of £60,000 to its debt advice service.

As Steve Hynes notes elsewhere in this issue, 2019 marks the 70th anniversary of the legal aid scheme. Hackney Community Law Centre’s manager Sean Canning points out that publicly funded legal advice is ‘the fourth pillar of the welfare state’. ‘We are deeply shocked and puzzled that this council should be hitting today’s custodians of that achievement of access to justice for the poor and vulnerable,’ he says.

Hackney Council’s advice services budget of £770,000 has been ringfenced. Speaking on behalf of the law centre’s trustees, councillor Deniz Oguzkanli notes that, although austerity has hit all of the borough’s services, this was ‘a deliberate and unconsulted upon’ change in how the council distributes money.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll