header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 June 2013 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7566 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Time’s winged chariot

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
istock_000015145004medium

Do not delay in bringing judicial review proceedings, warns Nicholas Dobson

Take a large measure of public sector austerity, season generously with political philosophy and slow-cook for some years in a warm council decision oven to get a dish delicious to some, but distasteful to others. The chef in question was London Borough of Barnet. For on 6 December 2012 the council decided to implement a long-gestating policy to outsource a substantial variety of council services.

The resident claimant and others were concerned that if the council’s proposals were implemented they would “lead to a serious deterioration in the council’s services, partly...because they believe that private sector organisations cannot evince the public service ethos...so important in the delivery of the council’s service”.

However, as Underhill LJ pointed out in the Administrative Court on 29 April 2013 (R (Nash) v London Borough of Barnet [2013] EWHC 1067 (Admin); [2013] All ER (D) 60 (May)): “It is not...for the court to decide whether those fears are justified. The decisions can only be challenged on the basis that the council has not acted in accordance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll