header-logo header-logo

06 September 2018 / Keith Wilding
Issue: 7807 / Categories: Features , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Time to be mindful

nlj_7807_wilding

Keith Wilding reviews the Mental Health Act & considers some ambitious proposals for a brighter future

  • Recognition of the need for resources.
  • Leading the way to social change.
  • Seeking to enhance the autonomy of the individual.
  • Linking future mental health provisions.
  • A single route of challenge to detention under the 1983 Act (potentially).

In October 2017 the prime minister commissioned an independent review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983) to be chaired by Sir Simon Wessely, a past president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. The terms of reference set out, among other things, the broad aim for people with mental health problems to be treated with dignity and for their liberty and autonomy to be protected as far as possible and to create ‘a forward looking plan of changes to legislation and practice, resulting in an enduring legacy of mental health support’. The Wessely review has recently published an interim report (‘The independent review of the Mental Health Act, Interim report’).

The review so far has raised the questions that it needs to answer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll