header-logo header-logo

13 July 2012 / Julian Miller , Sara Robertson
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Profession
printer mail-detail

The three Ps

E-disclosure requires preservation, preparation & proportionality, say Julian Miller & Sara Robertson

It has been 18 months since the introduction of the electronic disclosure practice direction PD31. Since then there have been several cases setting out the implications for practitioners and their clients.

There are three key considerations litigants and their advisers must address. A failure to do so may result in adverse costs orders.

Preservation

Paragraph 7 of PD31 provides: “As soon as litigation is contemplated, the parties’ legal representatives must notify their clients of the need to preserve disclosable documents. The documents to be preserved include electronic documents which would otherwise be deleted in the accordance with a document retention policy or otherwise deleted in the ordinary course of business.”

Good practice now requires that solicitors include an appropriate instruction in their retainer letters, but this will rarely be enough of itself. How often do clients read terms and conditions in full? At an appropriate stage early in any case likely to proceed to litigation, there must be a frank discussion with the client regarding e-disclosure. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll