header-logo header-logo

14 January 2016
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Thames Water recieves record fine for pollution

A water utility company has been fined a record £1m for polluting a canal in Hertfordshire.

The financial penalty imposed against Thames Water Utilities is the highest yet, and is part of a broader trend towards high fines as a result of new sentencing guidelines in July 2014.

St Albans Crown Court fined Thames Water last week for discharging polluted water from a sewage treatment works into the Grand Union Canal between July 2012 and April 2013. Thames Water pleaded guilty to two offences under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010. Under the regulations, large companies with a turnover of more than £50m can expect a fine of between £7,000 and £3m.

Thames Water fully co-operated with the Environment Agency and has invested £30,000 in improved machinery to avoid a repetition of the offence.

Judge Bright QC, in his sentencing comments, reportedly warned that “the time has now come for the courts to make clear that very large organisations really must bring about the reforms and improvements for which they say they are striving”. Those who did not, he said, could expect to attract sentences “sufficiently severe to have a significant impact on their finances”.

Paul Sheridan, partner at CMS Cameron McKenna, says: “There is a discernible trend towards higher fines for environment offences. There appears to be an underlying principle that only by focusing on increasing the financial consequences of offending will due note be taken by senior directors, and notably the CEO and finance director.”

Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll