header-logo header-logo

21 February 2014 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7595 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

web_vaines_0

Peter Vaines reports on a double dose of residency tests, the tax consequences of void transactions, penalties & costs

It will take time before the uncertainties in the new statutory residence test are resolved and it is only residence nerds who will keep agonising over all the various technicalities now. However, occasionally, something important pops up which deserves wider comment.

Under the automatic UK residence test, you will be conclusively UK resident if you have a UK home which is available to you for more than 91 consecutive days and you spend more than 29 days in it. So being in the UK for 30 days can be enough to make you resident. This could be an unpleasant surprise.

This will not apply if you have an overseas home where you spend more than 29 days during the year. However, a holiday home will not count. So you have a home in the UK and you have a home in France and you spend 30 days in your French home, then you are in the clear as far as the automatic UK test is concerned.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll