header-logo header-logo

26 June 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines pays a visit to Hotel California

The long awaited replacement for IR20 has now been received. It is called HMRC6. It is quite similar to IR20 except that it has all been rearranged which makes it rather difficult to compare. The main elements are still there although they are now hedged around with so many disclaimers that it begins to look like a letter of engagement. Why are they so keen to tell us that we cannot rely on their guidance—surely this is the only reason it has been published.

It is surprising that having regard to the critical importance that HMRC places on the concept of a distinct break in all the recent cases on the subject, there is no reference to it anywhere in HMRC6.

They rather over-emphasise that the act of leaving the UK does not mean you will automatically become non resident. After you leave the country, your residence position will be affected by a number of factors which include; the reason you left the UK; what visits you make the UK after you have left; what connections you

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll