header-logo header-logo

19 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tax

Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Cambridge v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKFTT 444 (TC), [2013] All ER (D) 52 (Sep)

It was settled law that the mere acquisition and holding of shares was not to be regarded as an economic activity within the meaning of the Sixth Council Directive (EEC) 77/388 (on the harmonization of the laws of the member states relating to turnover taxes—common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment). The mere acquisition of financial holdings in other undertakings did not amount to the exploitation of property for the purpose of obtaining income therefrom on a continuing basis because any dividend yielded by that holding was merely the result of ownership of the property and not the product of an economic activity within the meaning of the Sixth Directive. Transactions that consisted of obtaining income on a continuing basis from activities which went beyond the acquisition and sale of securities, such as transactions carried out in the course of a business trading in securities, could fall within the scope of the Sixth Directive, and depending on the nature of the activity

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll