header-logo header-logo

09 February 2012 / William Gibson
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

A taste for change?

Writing from experience, William Gibson shares some merger lessons

It was 25 years ago this month (2 February 1987) that the first announcement was made of the impending merger which was to form the megalith known as Clifford Chance. In a recent survey by the Law Consultancy Network of small and medium sized firms, 33% expect to be involved in mergers in 2012. In today’s recessionary climate, mergers generally are becoming increasingly common, but a quarter of a century ago the announcement sent shock waves through the profession.

Insider knowledge

So, what was it like to be on the inside of such a game-changing event? At the time of the announcement I worked for Coward Chance, in the costs department based, along with most of the support staff, in St Alphage House near the Barbican. The firm’s main office was in Royex House in Aldermanbury Square.

On the morning of 2 February, a costs contact at Herbert Smith phoned our office and told us he had just heard that we were about to be taken over. We had only just finished laughing this

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll