header-logo header-logo

15 December 2011 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Supermarket wars

HLE blogger Deborah L Parry wonders if supermarkets are off their trollies

"Last week, four of the UK’s biggest supermarkets were the focus of a report on supermarket price wars for BBC1’s Panorama, which suggested many of the pricing tactics used by supermarkets could potentially be illegal.

Supermarkets, like all other retailers supplying goods to consumers, have to comply with the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277).

Regulation 5 prevents traders giving false information or information which deceives or is likely to deceive the average consumer about, the price of products or the existence of a specific price advantage and which causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision they would not otherwise have taken.

Regulation 6 prohibits misleading omissions where material information is omitted, hidden, unclear, unintelligible, ambiguous or untimely and causes an average consumer to take a different transactional decision from that he would otherwise have taken.

To assist in interpreting these very broad and general prohibitions, the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills has issued the Pricing Practices Guide (November 2010).

This guide has no mandatory force and may, in some instances, go beyond what the law requires. It does, however, take into account the requirements of the Regulations and provides guidance for traders ‘on good practice in giving information about prices’. One would hope and expect our leading supermarkets to do their utmost to follow it.

In light of the current supermarket ‘price wars’, there are concerns over the way some products are marketed and the wording used in relation to prices. Asda, for example, in addition to their ‘Rollback’ pricing promotions, also have had items marked, both on the shelves in supermarkets and online, as ‘WOW’ items...”

To continue reading go to: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll