header-logo header-logo

Stress & headaches for judiciary under pressure

26 February 2025
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
Judges fear for their personal safety in and out of court, often work in dilapidated buildings, can’t sleep, suffer from headaches and experience bullying from ‘overbearing’ colleagues, according to the 2024 UK Judicial Attitude Survey.

Some 69% of district judges, 58% of district judges in the magistrates’ court (DJMCs) and 53% of senior coroners have concerns about their safety in court.

Last year, family judge Patrick Peruško was assaulted at Milton Keynes Family Court. In her annual press conference last week, the Lady Chief Justice, Baroness Carr expressed concerns about physical and online attacks and advised judges their safety in court is ‘paramount’.

The survey, carried out by the UCL Judicial Institute on behalf of the judiciary and published this week, covers all UK salaried and fee-paid judicial officeholders. An alarming 14% of all salaried judges, 7% of fee-paid, and 13% of coroners said they have experienced bullying in the past two years—‘primarily by undermining judges’ work, overbearing leadership, demeaning or ridiculing language’ and ‘primarily experienced from their own leadership judge or another judge at their court or a local authority official for coroners’.

If bullied, however, they are unlikely to speak out—more than two-thirds who experienced bullying, harassment or discrimination did not report it. They felt it would make no difference and could adversely affect their future career.

While many courts look impressive from the outside, the physical quality of the building is rated poor or unacceptable by 37% of all judges, and by 49% of district judges and 43% of circuit judges. More than three-quarters of judges say stress at work causes them to lose sleep, more than half suffer headaches and more than a quarter suffer ‘intolerance of others’.

Nevertheless, nearly all (93%) judges feel respected by judicial colleagues and almost all (83%) feel respected by their immediate leadership judge.

Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Health & safety
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll