header-logo header-logo

11 March 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Blogs , Practice areas
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

Dominic Regan casts a wry eye over some unusual cases..

When I was a little boy my mother took me to a talk given by a wise old man, Professor Ian Smith. Two things have always stayed with me. I had never heard profanities before and he said that in English law truth was stranger than anything one could ever invent. He was right as usual.

Over the years I have come across so many odd cases. Here are some of them. None are apocryphal. All are reported.

Our judiciary is the envy of the world. Read Garratt v Saxby (2004) 1 WLR 2152, [2004] All ER (D) 302 (Feb) and you will see why. The trial judge was inadvertently made aware of a payment into court at the start of the trial. This detail should only be revealed when all issues had been concluded. His ingenious solution? He ordered himself to forget it! I have a vision of the defendants saying you can’t do that and the judge asking “forget what?” Anyway, it went to the Court of Appeal which praised this pragmatic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll