header-logo header-logo

01 July 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Strange but true

Dominic Regan casts a wry eye over some interesting cases...

Be honest. What would you do if you were having problems with your neighbour? Kill them? Of course, which is what the defendant in Martin v Sherwood [1995] tried to do. His attempt to mow down the claimant only caused her £500 of injury for which she sued. The defendant then filed a remarkable defence asserting that she had sought to commit suicide by jumping in front of his vehicle. Even the Court of Appeal could see that this defence was a tad unreasonable and so awarded costs in a small claim as it is entitled to do where there is unreasonable conduct-CPR 27.14.

Another exotic defence was put forward in Ferguson v British Gas [2009] EWCA Civ 46. The claimant was bombarded with gas bills by the defendant for supplies she had never had from them. Eventually the claimant brought proceedings for harassment under the 1997 Protection From Harassment Act. Particularly handy here is a six-year limitation period and the ability to recover damages for mere distress as opposed to identifiable mental injury. Anyway,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll