header-logo header-logo

21 June 2024 / John Gould
Categories: Opinion , Rule of law
printer mail-detail

Spot the judge

177934
By diluting the judicial title, we risk interfering with the administration of justice, argues John Gould

Until it was abolished by the Crime and Courts Act 2013, scandalising the judiciary was a criminal offence intended to maintain public confidence in judges and the administration of justice. Public confidence is not to be taken for granted. Research published in 2019 by the Sentencing Council suggested that only around half of people surveyed thought that the criminal justice system was effective or fair. Judges are sometimes subjected to unconstitutional and unwarranted attack, such as the notorious newspaper headline describing three judges as ‘enemies of the people’ in 2016, but a more subtle undermining of the special perception of judges may be developing, arising from the presentation of individuals as ‘judges’ who are not.

It has long been accepted that for the administration of justice to operate successfully, the right to use the title ‘solicitor’ or ‘barrister’ must only be used by people who are actually solicitors or barristers. It is, for example, an offence under s 181 of the Legal Services Act 2007 for an unqualified

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll