header-logo header-logo

19 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Solicitor

Barnaby v Raleys [2013] Lexis Citation 59, [2013] All ER (D) 63 (Sep)

It was established law that in order for a court to make a finding of professional negligence against a solicitor it would first have to be determined whether there had in fact been a breach of duty. Second, if there had been, the court had to then ask whether the breach caused or materially contributed to the claimant’s alleged loss. Third, the court had to decide if the claimant had lost something of value in the sense that his prospects of success were more than negligible. Fourth, if the court decided that the claimant had lost a claim with more than a negligible prospect of success, it had to make a realistic assessment of what those prospects of success were. Finally, the court would need to make an assessment of what the likely value of the claim was having taken account of the prospects of success.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll