header-logo header-logo

07 April 2011
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Solicitor

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison [2011] EWHC 291 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 320 (Mar)

It was established law that the purposes of the imposition of sanctions on defaulting solicitors were three-fold:

(i) in some cases there might be a punitive element in order to punish the solicitor, if he had not been dealt with by the courts, and to deter others, however, such orders were not primarily punitive and often the order was not punitive in intention;

(ii) the order might be intended to ensure that the solicitor did not have the opportunity to repeat the offence; an order of suspension or striking off might achieve that in varying degrees; and, most fundamentally

(iii) the order was intended to maintain public confidence in the solicitors’ profession and its reputation. Further, because such orders were not primarily punitive, personal mitigation was likely to be of less effect. Nevertheless, the solicitors’ disciplinary tribunal also had to take into account the rights of the solicitor under Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll