header-logo header-logo

25 May 2017
Issue: 7747 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SMEs get tough about IP

Intellectual property has become a hot topic for small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs), with a 68% rise in legal proceedings.

According to law firm Hugh James, which has researched the subject, businesses are becoming more exposed to the risk of intellectual property theft as they move to online platforms. Original designs, images and video content can easily be reproduced or stolen from websites, causing damage to the business owner’s brand.

This has led to a sizeable increase in court proceedings launched to protect intellectual property.

A record 339 claims were heard by the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) in 2016, up from 202 in 2015. IPEC streamlines procedures to help businesses reach a speedy conclusion. It handles small business claims worth up to £500,000 and caps costs recoverable from the losing side at £50,000.

Hugh James said this cost-effectiveness makes IPEC more accessible to SMEs, giving them greater confidence to bring a claim. It said businesses are also increasingly able to leverage the value of their intellectual property to secure funding for investment, which gives them an incentive both to take pre-emptive action and to enforce any infringement.

Tracey Singlehurst-Ward, Hugh James partner, said: ‘While previously a business’s most valuable asset tended to be physical it is more often than not now found in some intangible intellectual property.

‘That could be patents, designs, trademarks and goodwill in their brands or other works attracting copyright.

‘We no longer have an economy focused in manufacturing, but rather have a fast pace technology sector driven to reach the next intellectual creation first. Failure to invest at a small cost early on or take steps to protect what you have can cost SMEs dearly later down the line.’

Issue: 7747 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll