header-logo header-logo

10 February 2012 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Small but perfectly formed

Is the small claims court so bad, asks Peter Thompson QC

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a litigant in person must be in want of a lawyer. This seems to be the conclusion of the working group set up by the Civil Justice Council to consider access to justice for litigants in person (November 2011). Its main task was “to consider what steps could be taken to improve access to justice for litigants in person”. Its starting point was that the present civil justice system was “a system of real quality, but one designed for lawyers, and which as a consequence was and is far too complex and obscure for those representing themselves”.

Troublesome system

Features of the civil justice system that must be troublesome for the litigant in person include the presumed mastery of a whole volume of protocols, rules, and practice directions. Even topics that have simple titles like disclosure, offers to settle, and costs turn out to have technical requirements and dire consequences for anyone who does not understand their intricacies. With legal aid, or a privately

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll