header-logo header-logo

10 February 2012 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Small but perfectly formed

Is the small claims court so bad, asks Peter Thompson QC

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a litigant in person must be in want of a lawyer. This seems to be the conclusion of the working group set up by the Civil Justice Council to consider access to justice for litigants in person (November 2011). Its main task was “to consider what steps could be taken to improve access to justice for litigants in person”. Its starting point was that the present civil justice system was “a system of real quality, but one designed for lawyers, and which as a consequence was and is far too complex and obscure for those representing themselves”.

Troublesome system

Features of the civil justice system that must be troublesome for the litigant in person include the presumed mastery of a whole volume of protocols, rules, and practice directions. Even topics that have simple titles like disclosure, offers to settle, and costs turn out to have technical requirements and dire consequences for anyone who does not understand their intricacies. With legal aid, or a privately

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll