header-logo header-logo

18 November 2022 / David Hewitt
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Features , Media , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Silents in court!

100864
Passions were often running high in the early days of cinema: David Hewitt takes a tour through some incidents which ended up in court

Silent films and the people who made them were forever finding themselves in court. And just before World War I, that was also true of the people who paid to see the films.

Sunday opening was once a real bone of contention. It was cinema proprietors who were had up for that—at least until the Electric Coliseum in Harringay was had up. When that happened, the cinema’s lawyer certainly earned his fee. All that was forbidden on a Sunday was the showing of inflammable films, he argued, and no evidence had been produced that his client’s films were of that kind. The case was dismissed and the lawyer, Archibald Bodkin, went on to become Director of Public Prosecutions (he would also try to ban James Joyce’s Ulysses).

Standing room only

But if the desire for seven-day opening reflected a huge demand for films, nothing reflected it more than people standing in the aisles. Councillors in Middlesex

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll