header-logo header-logo

A sigh of relief

Part one: Andrew Burns unravels the strands of the asbestos “trigger” trial

The employers’ liability (EL) policy “trigger” litigation was heard over nine weeks in the summer of 2008. It involved six lead cases, seven QCs, 13 junior counsel, numerous solicitors and five major insurers. Mr Justice Burton handed down a 109-page judgment on 21 November 2008: Durham v BAI (Run Off) Ltd (In Scheme of A0.rrangement) and other cases [2008] EWHC 2692 (QB), [2008] All ER (D) 220 (Nov).

The various test cases were heard together to resolve an important dispute over the relevant “trigger” under various employer’s liability insurance policies. The judge noted that the result would have “considerable consequences for several thousand people” and a “continuing impact for many years”.
The underlying claims were brought by employees who suffered and died from mesothelioma resulting from inhalation of asbestos fibres during employment. The employers’ insurers in these types of claims had paid out to victims for many years, but began to decline claims after a decision in the Court of Appeal on public liability (PL) insurance in Bolton v MMI [2006]
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll