header-logo header-logo

16 December 2011 / Lehna Hewitt , Kim Beatson
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Short but not sweet

Kim Beatson & Lehna Hewitt review the court’s approach to asset sharing & brief encounters

One of the factors under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25, which the court must have regard to when redistributing the assets on divorce, is the age of the parties and the duration of the marriage. What is the court’s approach when the marriage has been short?

The first point to consider is what is meant by a “short marriage”. Although this is a subjective question, it is generally accepted that a short marriage is one which has lasted for around five years or less. Pre-marriage cohabitation will be added to the length of the marriage (see GW v RW [2003] EWHC 611 (Fam), [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May), however, the duration of the marriage cannot be considered in isolation, and there may be a multitude of other relevant factors such as children, contributions, and earning potential. Although the court’s approach to the division of assets in short marriages has evolved in a somewhat piecemeal fashion, there are some solid rules which are worthy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll