header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013 / Edward Heaton , Anna Heenan
Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Scuppering unscrupulous spouses

istock_000007711731medium

What are the implications of a court setting aside a disposal made by a divorcing spouse to a third party? Anna Heenan & Ed Heaton report

It is not uncommon on divorce for people’s thoughts to turn to limiting their spouse’s financial claim. For the unscrupulous, this can go a step further with people “disposing” of assets to try and put them beyond their spouse’s reach. While the courts have a wide discretion under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) to redistribute assets between the parties on divorce, matters are inevitably more complicated when the assets in question are held by parties outside the marriage.

In the recent case of AC v DC (No 1) [2012] EWHC 2032 (Fam), the court had to consider the extent to which it was appropriate to invoke its power under s 37 of MCA 1973 to order the setting aside of a disposal made by one of the parties to the marriage to a third party in the form of an offshore corporate trustee.

Background

After the wife had issued her divorce petition, the husband

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll