header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013 / Edward Heaton , Anna Heenan
Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Scuppering unscrupulous spouses

istock_000007711731medium

What are the implications of a court setting aside a disposal made by a divorcing spouse to a third party? Anna Heenan & Ed Heaton report

It is not uncommon on divorce for people’s thoughts to turn to limiting their spouse’s financial claim. For the unscrupulous, this can go a step further with people “disposing” of assets to try and put them beyond their spouse’s reach. While the courts have a wide discretion under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) to redistribute assets between the parties on divorce, matters are inevitably more complicated when the assets in question are held by parties outside the marriage.

In the recent case of AC v DC (No 1) [2012] EWHC 2032 (Fam), the court had to consider the extent to which it was appropriate to invoke its power under s 37 of MCA 1973 to order the setting aside of a disposal made by one of the parties to the marriage to a third party in the form of an offshore corporate trustee.

Background

After the wife had issued her divorce petition, the husband

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll