header-logo header-logo

24 June 2016 / Olivia Staines
Issue: 7704 / Categories: Features , Profession , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Ruling arbitration

nlj_7704_ciarb3

Olivia Staines discusses the main features of CIArb’s new Arbitration Rules

The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators’ (CIArb) new Arbitration Rules, which came into effect on 1 December 2015, are very different from most other institutional rules. Hailed as the bearers of an “administration lite” service, they comprise input from the Institute’s 37 branches as well as 60 members of its international teaching faculty.

Why did CIArb decide to produce a new set of Arbitration Rules?

CIArb’s previous set of Rules were last revised in 2000 and crucially, they only applied to domestic arbitrations under the English Arbitration Act 1996. In order to resonate with the words in our Royal Charter and Bye-laws, which state that we are here to “promote and facilitate worldwide the determination of disputes by arbitration”, we decided to produce a new set of Rules in 2015 which could be applied internationally and cater to the ever-changing arbitration landscape.

Who drafted the new Rules?

A special sub-committee was gathered to produce the first draft of the new Rules. After review and amendment by CIArb’s Practice and Standards Committee (PSC), the draft

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll