header-logo header-logo

11 October 2013 / Robert Hines
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Revealing assets

istock_000017611994medium

Robert Hines on the family court’s approach to orders dealing with offshore assets

In January 2013, in the case of M v M [2013] EWHC 2534 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 133 (Aug), Mrs Justice King made a record £53m award to a Russian wife under Pt III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (Pt III). In reaching this decision, King J had to consider the recent landmark Supreme Court decision of Prest v Petrodel [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] All ER (D) 90 (Jun), in determining whether residential property owned by a number of companies could be transferred to the wife, notwithstanding the corporate veil.

Background

H and W are both Russian nationals, who met in 1987 when they worked in a factory together; H was a telephone technician and W worked in the cultural department. H and W starting living together in 1989 and they were married in 1991. There are four children of the family, although the oldest two (who are both over 18) are from the parties’ previous relationships. H has an adult son, Yuri, who was joined as a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll