header-logo header-logo

23 February 2022
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Respect embargo or risk contempt

Breaches of embargo on publication of the contents of a court judgment are ‘becoming more frequent’, the Court of Appeal has warned

Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, giving the main judgment, promised tough action on future breaches, while acknowledging that mistakes happen, in R (on the application of the Counsel General for Wales) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181, All ER (D) 79 (Feb).

The draft judgment in the case was sent by the judge’s clerk to counsel’s clerks at Matrix Chambers, with the statement that the draft was confidential and disclosure may be treated as contempt of court. However, a Matrix press release was uploaded too early, appearing on the chambers’ website, LinkedIn and Twitter. It was taken down as soon as the error was discovered and the senior practice manager at Matrix alerted the judge to the mistake, which she said occurred due to a ‘miscommunication’ within chambers.

Sir Geoffrey said: ‘I should say that I have called this case into court because, amongst other reasons, the breaches that occurred here are not alone.

‘I have become aware formally and informally of other breaches in other cases. It seems, anecdotally at least, that violations of the embargo on publicising either the content or the substance of draft judgments are becoming more frequent.

‘The purpose of this judgment is not to castigate those whose inadvertent oversights gave rise to the breaches in this case, but to send a clear message to all those who receive embargoed judgments in advance of hand-down that the embargo must be respected. In future, those who break embargoes can expect to find themselves the subject of contempt proceedings as paragraph 2.8 of CPR PD40E envisages.’

Concluding, he said it was not appropriate for persons in the clerks’ rooms or offices of chambers to see the draft judgment or be given a summary of its contents, and drafting press releases was not a legitimate activity to undertake within the embargo. He suggested one named clerk provide the link between the court and the barristers, and that chambers and solicitors put ‘proper precautions and double-checks’ in place to catch errors in time.

Issue: 7968 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll