header-logo header-logo

26 April 2012 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Relative values

Dr Chris Pamplin takes a hard look at the expert witness-specific recommendations from the Family Justice Review

The Family Justice Review Panel report (published in November 2011) contains several recommendations that are of particular significance for both expert witnesses practising in the family courts and those who instruct them. Announcing publication of the report, the Panel said that its recommendations were aimed at tackling “shocking delays in the system” and generally improving the family justice system.

Usefulness of expert evidence

The 155-page report devotes a little over nine pages to matters relating directly to expert witnesses. The section commences with a somewhat ambiguous statement as to the usefulness of expert evidence in child cases in the family courts. Acknowledging that expert evidence is “often necessary to a fair and complete process”, there has been a trend towards what the Review Panel believes is “unjustified use of expert witness reports, with consequent delay for children”.

It will be apparent, therefore, that this section of the report begins with a rebuttable presumption that there is an overuse of expert witnesses with a consequent increase

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll