header-logo header-logo

18 July 2012
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Reigning Supreme

Former Supreme Court critic to become its president

Lord Neuberger will be the next president of the Supreme Court.

He will be sworn in at a special ceremony at the court on 1 October.

The current Master of the Rolls says he will do his “best to ensure that [the court] continues to play its proper role in upholding the rule of law”. His replacement as Master of the Rolls has not yet been announced.

Lord Phillips, who is retiring, says his successor “brings not only a wealth of judicial experience but the ability to lead a collegiate court”.

Lord Neuberger previously served as a Law Lord in the House of Lords, and as a Lord Justice of Appeal. His first judicial appointment was as a Recorder in 1990.

In 2006–07, he led a Bar Council investigation into widening access to the barristers’ profession. He has also chaired a committee looking at super-injunctions.

Daniel Barnett, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers, says: “Lord Neuberger is probably the most prominent and approachable judge in Britain today, well known for his report on super-injunctions last year and for permitting tweeting in court.

“He was an initial critic of the Supreme Court when it was set up in 2009, stating that there was a real danger of the court taking more power than its predecessor—the House of Lords judicial committee—and becoming an opposition movement to the government of the day.

“It is unlikely that Lord Neuberger, who has spoken out about the Supreme Court not abrogating the powers of an elected parliament, will take the UK Supreme Court in the direction of the US Supreme Court, which is often willing to strike down legislation. In a speech last year, he emphasised parliamentary sovereignty is a core element of the UK constitution. But this approach may be challenged, as more and more UK legislation is scrutinised by the higher courts for its compatibility with EU treaties and the European Convention on Human Rights.”

Issue: 7523 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll