header-logo header-logo

28 July 2015
Issue: 7663 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Regulator warning on boycott

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued a warning to solicitors planning action over criminal legal aid changes that they must fully consider “the circumstances of each individual client” and ensure they meet required standards.

The warning follows a change in tactic by solicitors’ groups, who will now accept magistrates’ and police station work but boycott the Crown court.

The SRA says that where a client requires advocacy in court, “it is in the best interests of the client for the firm to use its best endeavours to secure advocacy for the client. 

“This may include the use of appropriately qualified advocates employed by the firm as well as external advocates. It is the client’s best interests that are paramount once instructions have been accepted.”

Criminal legal aid solicitors have been boycotting new work since 1 July, when a fees cut of 8.75% was imposed. Members of the Criminal Bar have supported the action by declining new work and refusing “returns” from the courts.

In a joint statement last week, Criminal Law Solicitors Association (CLSA) chair Bill Waddington and London Criminal Court Solicitors Association (LCCSA) chair Jon Black said they had struggled to keep the action going because “the Big Firms” were ready to pull out.

Therefore, they had persuaded these firms to remain involved on the basis of no representation in the Crown Court.

“There is currently a critical mass of unrepresented defendants in the Crown Court and the continuation of the protocol would continue where it is most visible,” they said. 

 

Issue: 7663 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll