header-logo header-logo

02 July 2020 / John Gould
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Regulation matters: Time for change

23518
John Gould applauds Professor Mayson for his attempt to detangle the regulation of title & the regulation of activity

Professor Stephen Mayson has just published his report ‘Reforming Legal Services—Regulation beyond the Echo Chambers’. It is a prodigious piece of work. Professor Mayson has worked long and hard and consulted far and wide, to produce what is probably the most comprehensive and reliable review of legal regulation in England and Wales ever undertaken.

There should be a hunger for reform, but perhaps those responsible to deliver change have no appetite at all to do so. This is not just about other preoccupations, although we are in a time of other preoccupations, it is about believing that making the effort to change and pursuing a long overdue coherent vision for legal services is worth the trouble. Dealing with lawyers is almost always trouble—perhaps because that’s their business.

In his report, Professor Mayson is much too generous about the Byzantine structures which have accumulated before and after the Legal Services Act 2007. Personally, I have never seen the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll