header-logo header-logo

08 November 2023
Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Reforms for landlords, renters & homeowners

Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the inclusion in the King’s Speech of legislation to help leaseholders, with some warning reform will be complex and difficult while others predict little will change

Setting out the government’s legislative priorities for the next 12 months, King Charles announced a Leasehold and Freehold Bill to ban the creation of new leasehold houses and make it cheaper and easier for more leaseholders to: extend their lease, with a standard term of 990 years and zero ground rent for both houses and flats; buy their freehold; and take over management of their building. The rights will apply to leaseholders in buildings with up to 50% non-residential floorspace (such as flats above shops) and leaseholders will no longer have to wait two years before applying.

A Renters (Reform) Bill will also be introduced, abolishing ‘no-fault evictions’, adding mandatory grounds for possession including that the landlord wishes to sell the property or move a family member in, and providing for eviction within two weeks for a breach of the tenancy agreement or damage to the property. The Bill provides for a Private Rented Sector Ombudsman with binding powers to resolve tenancy disputes.

However, Jeremy Raj, head of residential property at Irwin Mitchell, said none of the proposals ‘deal with the fundamental issues troubling the housing market, such as lack of supply, uncertainty regarding future regulation, unsuitable stock for our environmental ambitions and our population profile, and of course the affordability crisis’. Moreover, Raj said the leasehold bill ‘disappoints those of us who have been hoping for many years now for a co-ordinated and fundamental overhaul of the areas that have let leasehold down as a system of tenure’.

Mark Chick, director of the Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners and partner at Bishop & Sewell, said the leasehold bill could be good news or ‘could fuel confusion, cost and controversy’.

Chick said extending leases to 990 years was an ‘easy win’, and highlighted his view that removing leasehold for new flats isn’t possible ‘until the work necessary to make the existing system of commonhold fit for purpose is complete’. 

Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll