header-logo header-logo

03 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

"Red tape" harassment repeal

Section 40 of the Equality Act 2010 is abolished

Employers’ section 40 requirement to safeguard employees against harassment from clients and customers has been abolished.

Under s 40 of the Equality Act 2010, an employer was liable for harassment of its employees by third parties, such as customers on the shop floor, over whom the employer had no direct control. The liability was triggered where the harassment took place in the course of the employee’s work, the employee had been harassed at least twice before, and the employer knew about it and had not taken reasonable steps to prevent a recurrence.

Section 40 was repealed on 1 October. 

Tom Walker, employment law partner at Manches, says: “The repeal is probably a realistic, practical move in that the vast majority of employees will continue to be protected from harassment by the Equality Act, if they have a protected characteristic. However, it’s always a shame to see some well-principled, perhaps idealistic, piece of legislation being curtailed.”

Walker said the probable reasons for the repeal were that the provisions went further than the relevant Directive required, and it fitted the political climate of cutting “red tape”

 

Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll