header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 January 2009 / James Naylor , Claire Southway
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Rebuild & renewal

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

James Naylor & Claire Southway explain why Risegold is good news for developers

 

The Court of Appeal has recently provided much food for thought in the case of Risegold Ltd v Escala Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1180, Risegold Ltd v Escala Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 269 (Oct). It concerned neighbouring freehold premises at Quaker Court, London E1, consisting of warehouse/industrial units, and the extent of an easement granted to the owner of one of those premises, giving it the right to enter into part of the adjoining premises.
In 1993, both Risegold and Escala’s premises were in joint ownership. Title in units 5 and 6 was transferred to Risegold’s predecessors in title on 28 July 1993, and the title in units 3 and 4 to Escala on 6 August 1993.
The grant (or reservation) of the benefit to Risegold was in all material respects identical in both transfers and was in the following terms: “The right (exercisable upon prior notice of not less than forty eight hours given to the owners and occupiers of the Adjoining Property) to enter
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll