header-logo header-logo

10 December 2015
Issue: 7680 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A race relations half-century

Fifty years on from the Race Relations Act 1965, can we say that anti-discrimination law has worked well? Geoffrey Bindman QC, who served as the Race Relations Board’s legal adviser for the whole of its 10-year existence, assesses the effectiveness of anti-discrimination law and the choices that were made in its introduction, in an article in this week’s NLJ. The 1965 Act imposed civil rather than criminal sanctions since the introductions of criminal sanctions in the US was judged to have failed. However the British version was “narrow in scope and the sanctions were weak”. Legislation requires enforcement, he writes, and while equality has improved there is still some way to go.

Issue: 7680 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll