header-logo header-logo

10 November 2021
Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Race at the Bar: action required

Barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds find it harder to secure pupillage and face systemic obstacles throughout their career, according to a report by the Bar Council’s Race Working Group

It found access to the Bar, career progression, the most prestigious and best paying work, retention, and working environment were all influenced by ethnicity and structural discrimination.

A black woman publicly funded criminal junior barrister with the same level of experience as a white male junior would bill on average £18,700 a year less, and an Asian woman £16,400 less. At all levels, white male barristers earned the highest fee income, women earned less than men, and black women earned the least.

Speaking anonymously, barristers reported ‘there is a need to tone down your blackness’; and ‘it can be invaluable for individuals not to be the only person from an ethnic minority background in the room’.

Some 58% of black and Asian women at the Bar had personally experienced bullying and harassment at work or online, four times more than their white male counterparts. Barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds were more likely to be referred to the regulator.

While Asian judges make up 5% of the judiciary, only 1% of judges are black and 2% are from mixed ethnic backgrounds. Some of the six main practice areas have no QCs from ethnic minority backgrounds at all. In England and Wales in total there are only five black/black British female QCs, and 17 black/black British male QCs.

Barbara Mills QC and Simon Regis, co-chairs of the Group, said: ‘Quite rightly, practising barristers within the profession have expressed frustration over the amount of talk about race inequality at the Bar, and the lack of action and failure to bring about change.’

The report, Race at the Bar, made 23 detailed recommendations, on access, retention, progression and Bar culture. Recommended actions included measures on training, monitoring of work distribution, targeted career support, sponsorship and mentoring.

Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll