header-logo header-logo

18 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

QOCS for defamation & privacy

New proposals for qualified one-way costs shifting

The Ministry of Justice has proposed introducing costs protection for defamation and invasion of privacy claimants.

Its consultation, Costs Protection in Defamation and Privacy Claims, published last week, is a response to concerns raised by the Leveson Report that people of modest means are put off suing members of the media because of the risk they could end up having to pay enormous costs.

Under the proposals, qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS) will enable judges to impose a one-way costs order where it is clear one side would not otherwise be able to take part. A costs order could also be imposed to help a small media outlet contest a case brought by a wealthy individual.

The changes are intended to come into effect from April 2014, alongside reforms to “no win no fee” defamation and privacy cases.

QOCS was introduced for personal injury cases in April.

The consultation closes on 8 November 2013.

Justice Minister, Helen Grant says: “Defamation and invasion of privacy can have a devastating effect on lives and it is crucial that people, whatever their means, can stand up for their rights in court even when they are facing a wealthy opponent who can afford to appoint a team of expensive lawyers.”

Issue: 7576 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll