header-logo header-logo

19 September 2018
Issue: 7809 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Personal injury woes & highs

Quality of service in personal injury market ‘crucial’

Mystery shoppers have uncovered a series of poor responses from personal injury (PI) lawyers, including inappropriate replies, slowness to follow-up and a lack of enthusiasm.

Posing as potential clients, mystery shoppers hired by legal marketing collective First4Lawyers contacted 50 law firms both by telephone and through their website, ranking each firm’s efforts to gain their business.

One mystery shopper revealed: ‘I said it was an accident at work, to which she replied, “lovely, thank you,” with a level of enthusiasm that was entirely inappropriate.’ Another asked for the receptionist’s name three times and was told it didn’t matter because ‘she was going to lunch’.

Where the shopper left a message and the firm had to call back, an astonishing 23% of firms did not do so for more than two days, or at all. On the other hand, 35% of firms had called back within 15 minutes.

The shoppers also reported the lack of a sense that the firm really wanted the work, with only 52% of the firms attempting to add value or ‘go further’ for the potential client, and firms often failing to explain their value to the client and usually not offering to send further information or make a follow-up call.

Nevertheless, four-fifths of firms were ‘warm and engaging’ overall, according to the shoppers. Some 84% of web enquiries led to a telephone conversation. When asked to rate the likelihood of recommending the firm to others on a scale of 1-10, 62% of firms received an 8, 9 or perfect 10.

Qamar Anwar, First4Lawyers’s managing director, said: ‘Low-value PI is an unusual market in that there is no real price competition.

‘So, the quality of service, from the moment the phone rings or the email pings, is crucial. This is especially important given legal regulators’ efforts to encourage consumers to shop around for a lawyer.’

Issue: 7809 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll