header-logo header-logo

An own e-goal?

nlj_7645_chris-bryden-michael-salter

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter explain why common sense trumps policy in cases involving online misconduct

Does the sending of pornographic material to male friends and a junior female employee amount to gross misconduct? Mr Justice Lewis determined that it did in the recent case of Williams v Leeds United Football Club [2015] EWHC 376 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 218 (Feb). The case is important for a number of reasons. It has made headlines due to the nature of the parties. From a legal perspective, however, it is of interest for two main reasons: first, the fact that the misconduct in question was discovered five years after it had occurred, and after notice of redundancy had been given; and second, for its consideration of the applicability of the employer’s e-mail and IT policy.

The facts

The facts of the case are relatively straightforward. Evan Gwyn Williams was employed as the technical director of Leeds United from August 2006, having previously worked for Chelsea. His salary with Leeds was £200,000 per annum, terminable on 12 months’ notice. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll