header-logo header-logo

27 February 2025
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Overhaul of CCRC part of wide-ranging changes suggested for appeals

The Law Commission has proposed sweeping reforms to the criminal appeals process, including changing the ‘real possibility’ test used by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

Its consultation on criminal appeals, published this week, addresses concerns that the test blocks some miscarriages of justice from being corrected and is too deferential to the appeal court.

Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, said: ‘We received persuasive evidence that the “real possibility” test used by the CCRC may lead the CCRC to focus its investigations too narrowly and so neglect lines of inquiry that might exonerate a person.

‘Rather than focusing on what the appeal court may do, we think the CCRC should first form its own view as to whether a conviction may be unsafe.’

Where the wrongly convicted seek compensation, they must prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt, which Professor Lewis warned ‘can present an insurmountable obstacle’. The Law Commission suggests a civil standard of proof be used instead.

It also proposes establishing an independent inspectorate for the CCRC. It would also increase the courts’ and CCRC’s powers to investigate claims a conviction is unsafe due to misconduct by jurors, remove the ‘case stated’ procedure in summary proceedings, and abolish the requirement for Court of Appeal certification so more appeals reach the Supreme Court.

Professor Lewis said: ‘As the Post Office scandal has demonstrated, anyone can be a victim of a miscarriage of justice.’

The Law Commission also seeks views on the time limits for lodging an appeal, and the composition and terms of appointment of CCRC Commissioners. It asks whether the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme should be expanded to cover offences such as causing death by careless driving and animal cruelty, and whether to expand the range of situations where an acquitted person can be retried due to compelling new evidence.

It asks for views on whether it should be lawful to disclose evidence for the purposes of responsible journalism to reveal a possible miscarriage of justice. Finally, it proposes establishing a National Forensic Archive Service for the long-term storage of evidence used in trials. The consultation ends on 30 May.

Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll