header-logo header-logo

Once more unto the breach?

10186978_4

Post Edwards, Stewart Duffy & Alex Leslie address the tensions between breach of contract & unfair dismissal

The consequences of the interaction between the common law action for breach of contract and its associated remedies and the newer statutory claim for unfair dismissal and the remedies available from the tribunal have been described by various law lords as “awkward”, “unfortunate” and “anomalous” and in need of “urgent attention by the legislature”. In the Supreme Court decision of Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58, [2011] All ER (D) 101 (Dec), Lord Phillips described it as a difficult area of law and acknowledged that it may need to be fundamentally reviewed.

Edwards: the facts

Edwards was employed as a consultant surgeon. His contract of employment included an express term entitling his employer to dismiss him on three months’ notice. For the appeal it was accepted that there were express terms relating to the disciplinary process and that the contract incorporated the relevant trust disciplinary process, derived from a Department

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll