header-logo header-logo

03 November 2011
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No to sacking slackers

Lawyers express dismay at unfair dismissal law plans

Employment lawyers have given short shrift to leaked proposals to scrap unfair dismissal laws.

A report by venture capitalist Adrian Beecroft for Downing Street, leaked to the press last week, proposes replacing unfair dismissal with “compensated no fault dismissal”. Employers would be allowed to sack staff with basic redundancy pay and notice. Beecroft concedes that employers could sack staff because they don’t like them, but this is “a price worth paying”.

However, lawyers warn that this could create a rise in discrimination claims, which have no limit on the amount of compensation claimed.

Bronwyn McKenna, chair of the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) legislative and policy committee, says: “If the proposals outlined in Beecroft’s leaked report on unfair dismissal were to be adopted, that would arguably lead to a two-tier system of protection in the workplace, ie legal safeguards will apply to employees with a protected characteristic under the Equality Act and not to those who aren’t so covered.”

On whether the UK could lawfully introduce such a proposal, McKenna said unfair dismissal is “a creation of English statute”, therefore there “may not be an insuperable EU hurdle. There may be questions about the UK’s compliance under its international law obligations”.

Linda Farrell, employment partner at Bristows, says: “Until we see more flesh on the proposal, it is difficult to see how it could work. If an employer says to an employee that they are ‘not up to scratch and should think of hanging up their boots’ it would drive a coach and horses through our age discrimination laws if such a comment could never be raised in an employment tribunal.”

Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll